That’s unfortunate, because RSS provides everyday internet users with an easy way to organize all of their online-content consumption-news media, blogs, YouTube channels, even search results for favorite terms-in one place, curated by the user, not an algorithm.

But despite the syndication format’s cult following, most internet users have never heard of it. Introducing a quarter-century-old technology as if it were novel might seem a little strange. Fortunately, there already exists a long-standing alternative that provides users with what social media does not deliver: RSS. These developments underscore a stark reality: As long as we rely on social-media sites to curate what we read, we allow them to control what we read, and their interests are not our interests. Meta did the same when it launched Meta Verified, a subscription service that promised it would provide paying users with “increased visibility and reach.”

But in his typically crass way, Musk was just making obvious what was always the case for his industry. (Musk denies having done so.) This might seem to say more about Musk’s vanity than about social media in its entirety. Last month, Elon Musk reportedly had his engineers alter Twitter’s algorithm so that it fed his own tweets to the platform’s users, whether they followed him or not.

Lately, this deception has become more transparent. Algorithmic timelines quietly replaced chronological ones, until our social-media feeds no longer took direction from us, but rather directed us where they wanted us to go.

Over time, though, the sites were carefully calibrated to filter what users saw-regardless of their stated preferences-in order to manipulate their attention and keep them on the platform. Platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter enticed countless users to join with the promise that they could see everything their friends or favorite celebrities posted in one convenient location.

Twitter rss